ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 243-245

The classic sciatic nerve block approach ( are dorsal twitches better than plantar twitches?)


Department of Anesthesiology, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Ahmad Muhammad Taha
Department of Anesthesiology, Abu Dhabi Knee and Sports Medicine Center (ADKSMC), Abu Dhabi, UAE

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.7123/01.ASJA.0000415062.28582.d4

Rights and Permissions

Background Using the classic approach, the authors compared the success rate and time of onset of a sciatic nerve block after eliciting plantar twitches with those obtained after eliciting dorsal twitches. Methods Eighty patients, who underwent cruciate ligament reconstruction, underwent a classic sciatic nerve block procedure after eliciting plantar twitches of the foot or toes (group 1) or after eliciting dorsal twitches (group 2). The success rate of achieving a complete sciatic nerve block and its time of onset were recorded. Results In group 1, a complete sciatic nerve block was achieved more frequently, and the time of onset of sensory and motor blocks of the tibial fibers of the sciatic nerve was more rapid (86.8%; 10.8 ±5 and 12.5 ±6 min, respectively) compared with that in group 2 (57.5%; 20.6± 7 and 23±10.8 min, respectively; Po0.05). Conclusion Using the classic approach, eliciting of plantar twitches (tibial fiber stimulation) may result in more frequent achievement of a complete sciatic nerve block compared with eliciting of dorsal twitches (common peroneal fiber stimulation).


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1053    
    Printed25    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded122    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal