ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 30-37

Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam/propofol or midazolam/fentanyl for conscious sedation during awake fiberoptic intubation


Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, New Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Sanaa A. El-Tohamy
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, 11835 New Cairo
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.7123/01.ASJA.0000423100.80958.f5

Rights and Permissions

Background

Awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) is an established technique for the management of patients with difficult airways. A number of drugs have been described to provide sedation for this procedure. Benzodiazepines combined with opioids or propofol are commonly used agents. Recently, dexmedetomidine has emerged as an ideal sedative during AFOI.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine as a sole sedative versus the conventionally used propofol/midazolam and fentanyl/midazolam combinations during AFOI.

Patients and methods

Seventy-five patients with anticipated difficult airways who required tracheal intubation for elective surgery were enrolled and randomly allocated to one of three groups: group D (n=25) received a dexmedetomidine infusion, group PM (n=25) received a propofol/midazolam combination, and group FM (n=25) received a fentanyl/midazolam combination. The main outcome measures were fiberoptic intubating conditions and patient tolerance, which were graded using multiple scoring systems. Other parameters including hemodynamic (mean arterial pressure and heart rate) and respiratory changes were recorded.

Results

All the scores that quantified patient tolerability and the fiberoptic intubating conditions were significantly better in group D than both groups PM and FM. Mean arterial pressure and heart rate decreased significantly during sedation in group D and group PM. Meanwhile, there was considerable hemodynamic stability in both group D and PM during intubation. The dexmedetomidine group showed more favorable respiratory changes than the other two groups.

Conclusion

Dexmedetomidine alone appears to be a more suitable agent for sedation during AFOI compared with either propofol/midazolam or fentanyl/midazolam combinations.



[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed995    
    Printed30    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded173    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal