ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 244-246

Does the self-pressurizing Air Q produce less postoperative sore throat compared with the classic laryngeal mask airway? A randomized controlled double-blind study


Department of Anaesthesia, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Mohamed I.S. El-Ahl
Department of Anaesthesia, Ain Shams University, Cairo 7400
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.156700

Rights and Permissions

Background The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk for postoperative sore throat (POST) using the self-pressurizing Air Q compared with that using classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Patients and methods A total of 150 patients were included in this double-blind prospective study. After induction of general anesthesia, the airway was maintained with an Air Q device (in group Q, 75 patients) and with a classic LMA (in group C, 75 patients). The POST was evaluated and graded (on the basis of its severity) within 20 min in the recovery room and 24 h after surgery. Results The incidence of POST and its severity were comparable in both groups. Conclusion Despite the self-pressurizing cuff of Air Q, there was no reduction in the POST incidence or severity compared with that using classic LMA.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1433    
    Printed53    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded104    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal